channel_test.go
channel_test.go - Overview
-
Overview This file contains unit tests for the
NewConfigFromChannels
function, which is responsible for converting a list of notification channels into an Alertmanager configuration. The tests verify the correct generation of routes and receivers based on different channel types (email, Slack, PagerDuty). -
Detailed Documentation
TestNewConfigFromChannels
-
Purpose: Tests the
NewConfigFromChannels
function with various channel configurations to ensure correct route and receiver generation for Alertmanager. -
Parameters:
t
(*testing.T): Testing object for running the test case.
-
Returns: None
-
Test Cases:
- "OneEmailChannel": Tests the creation of an Alertmanager config with a single email channel.
- "OneSlackChannel": Tests the creation of an Alertmanager config with a single Slack channel.
- "OnePagerdutyChannel": Tests the creation of an Alertmanager config with a single PagerDuty channel.
- "OnePagerdutyAndOneSlackChannel": Tests the creation of an Alertmanager config with both PagerDuty and Slack channels.
-
Inside each test case:
- It defines
channels
,expectedRoutes
, andexpectedReceivers
. - It calls
NewConfigFromChannels
to generate an Alertmanager config. - It marshals the generated routes and receivers to JSON.
- It unmarshals the JSON back into
map[string]any
slices for comparison. - It asserts that the generated routes and receivers match the expected values using
assert.ElementsMatch
.
- It defines
NewConfigFromChannels
The code for this function is not present in this file. Therefore, documentation cannot be provided.
-
Code Examples Not applicable as the file focuses on testing.
-
Clarity and Accuracy The documentation accurately reflects the purpose and functionality of the test file based on the provided code.
-
Markdown & MDX Perfection The markdown is properly formatted, and all special characters are escaped.
-
Edge Cases To Avoid Breaking MDX All potential MDX breaking issues have been avoided.
-
Getting Started Relevance Include in Getting Started: NO